Spend a few minutes online and you’ll come off convinced EstroBlock is the next best thing since sliced bread. This ‘miracle supplement’ is all rage in various natural acne cure blogs and forums. Sellers claim it ‘detoxifies toxic estrogens’ and thus protects against breast cancer, gets rid of stubborn fat and, even cures acne.
I occasionally get questions about EstroBlock, so let’s apply some skepticism and critical thinking and see how well this supposed miracle supplement stands up to science and critical scrutiny.
The short story is not well. Not well at all. DIM, the substance in EstroBlock, shows potential in cancer prevention, but the data is too preliminary to conclude anything. Yet, the sellers show remarkable ignorance of science (or lack of ethics) while making overcooked claims about this potentially useful supplement.
Read This Book And You'll Know Exactly What You Have To Do To Banish Acne From Your Life - Forever
Can't make sense of acne? Nothing seems to work? Then you are doing it wrong. Science has clearly shown that getting clear is much easier than you think. I've done the hard work for you - just follow this simple roadmap.Read more
What is EstroBlock
EstroBlock is a supplement containing Diindolylmethane (DIM) and Indole 3-Carbinol (I3C). I3C is a substance found in cruciferous vegetables and is thought to be one of the reasons they are so healthy. In acidic conditions, such as in the stomach, I3C is converted into DIM. I3C works purely as DIM precursor and doesn’t seem to be absorbed.
In order to justify higher prices EstroBlock website claims other DIM supplements are useless since they are not absorbed properly. Their words: “Most other brands use what is called crystalline DIM which has almost no absorbtion into the body.” They also claim 500% higher absorption than other brands.
I can’t say for sure, but it looks like they are using a patented form of DIM called Bio-Response DIM (BR DIM). Human studies comparing absorption rates between normal and Bio-Response DIM haven’t been published, apparently some have been presented in medical conferences. One study in mice found BR DIM had 150% better bioavailability than normal DIM.
While it’s true that BR DIM has better bioavailability it doesn’t mean that other DIM supplements would be useless.
How EstroBlock fools you about science
While they don’t directly claim it, the EstroBlock website strongly implies that their supplement can prevent breast and other cancers – as well as help you to lose weight and cure acne. One of the most prominent headlines on their home page reads “Scientifically proven to protect you”, under which has a headline reading “Cancer protection”. The copy further reinforces the idea that the supplement can protect against cancer.
Given the claims you would think that the section titled “Journal references” contains several many, or at least some, studies showing that the supplement can indeed protect against cancer.
So you would think. Alas, that’s not the case. Not even close.
While the papers they feature on the ‘Journal references’ page have impressive titles, such as “Indole-3-carbinol and prostate cancer” and “Targets for indole-3-carbinol in cancer prevention“, there’s nothing there that shows EstroBlock actually prevents cancer, or any other disease, in humans.
They feature tons and tons of extremely preliminary research. Test tube and animal studies examining possible mechanisms by which DIM might prevent cancer. These are studies that, for example, look at the effect incubating individual cells in DIM has. It’s highly dishonest to claim, even infer, from such studies that DIM would have similar effects in living humans.
There are some preliminary human studies that show shifts in estrogen metabolites in people taking DIM. But it’s not clear whether that affects disease outcomes.
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center page on DIM says this:
Diindolylmethane is a compound found in cruciferous vegetables including broccoli, cabbage, and cauliflower. It showed anticancer effects in laboratory and animal studies. However, human studies are limited.
Out of 100 cancer cures that show promise in test tube and animal studies maybe 1 has any potential as actual treatment, and that’s when you are lucky. The scientific literature is littered with promising cancer cures that, for whatever reason, didn’t work in humans.
Will DIM work as cancer treatment in humans? It may, but then again it may not. Nobody knows yet. It’s true that it shows promise and the National Institutes of Health is currently testing it in humans, but until those studies are complete we just don’t know.
The problem is that the EstroBlock website gives an impression of scientific legitimacy and support when that’s not even remotely the case.
I can think of two reasons for this. One, they are clueless and have just compiled a list of studies without understanding what they mean. Or, they outright deceive people, knowing full well that the vast majority of their readers are impressed with a long list of complicated looking references.
I’m not sure which is worse.
EstroBlock for acne?
One of their more ridiculous claims is that excess estrogens cause acne. Have they been completely asleep for the past 2 decades when a study after study has shown that it’s androgens, male sex hormones, that cause acne – not estrogens!
There’s very little research on how estrogens affect acne, but all the research points to estrogens protecting against acne, probably by opposing the effect androgens have on the skin, which is the reason why doctors prescribe birth control pills for women with acne.
Role of hormones in acne vulgaris by Arora, et al. had this to say about estrogens (emphasis mine):
A case control study conducted in north Indian population reported low serum estrogen levels in patients with acne vulgaris as compared to controls. Also, when a woman’s estrogen levels decline, as they do just before the beginning of a menstrual cycle, acne may worsen . This is also supported by the fact that acne is commonest at puberty because of the low level of estrogens and progesterone during the first few menstrual cycles.
As I said, research on the effect of estrogens on acne is still limited, but based on the currently available evidence reducing or ‘detoxifying’ estrogen is the last thing anyone with acne would want.
The relationship between xenoestrogens and sex hormones may not be as simple as some people would have you believe. For example Galloway et al. found that BPA exposure was associated with slightly increased total testosterone level in men, yet no change was seen in women, and even in men there was no change in bioactive (free) testosterone.
Nobody denies that xenoestrogens may have negative health effects, especially in infants and young children, and perhaps some day science learns that xenoestrogens do cause acne. But until such time I’m going to consider this just another made up disease promoted by alt-med and natural health quacks.
The testimonial deception
Having no science to back up the claims, they do what most supplement companies do, resort to testimonials and reviews.
But when it comes to evaluating health claims testimonials and other anecdotal data should be taken with a giant heaping of salt.
Just a few hundred years ago everybody knew that blood letting and leeching worked. And let’s not forget the radium craze of the early 20th Century. After it was discovered to kill caner cells, people couldn’t get enough of radium. It became an instant hit. It was added to drinking water. People took radium pills as supplements. There were even radium creams for acne! Everybody knew that radium works and the sellers featured glowing testimonials to entice new customers.
As we know now, this story doesn’t have a happy ending. Later, through scientific inquiry, the negative effects of radium became clear.
These are just two examples of the perils of relying on anecdotal data to answer complex questions. As humans are hard-wired to find anecdotes and personal testimonials compelling. They have served us well through our evolution. If you got sick after eating particular red berries it’s evolutionary beneficial to conclude those berries should be avoided.
The problem is that our world is infinitely more complex today and such simplistic shortcuts don’t cut it anymore. Questions regarding health often have many variables and without properly controlling for those variables it’s almost impossible to separate facts from fiction. Anecdotes not only lack controls but are often also subject to motivated reasoning and human biases. Since this is not a post about why anecdotes and testimonials are unreliable, I’m going to refer you to Dr. Steven Novella’s post over at Science-Based Medicine blog.
When you see someone hyping testimonials and anecdotes over scientific data, it’s good to keep in mind the wise words of Dr. Steven Novella.
It is interesting to note that the scientific community has long ago made up its collective mind about the weaknesses and role of anecdotes. Logic and the lessons of history speak very clearly on this issue. But there are forces at work today that want to turn back the clock on scientific progress – they want to bring back anecdotes as a reliable source of medical evidence, essentially returning to the pre-scientific era of medicine.
And many of those people openly say this is a good thing. It’s a feature not a bug, people.
At the moment there’s no evidence to show EstroBlock is good for anything. While DIM and I3C show promise in cancer prevention the evidence is too preliminary to conclude anything.
There’s no evidence to support the notion that ‘toxic extrogens’ cause acne, in fact, all the evidence points to estrogens reducing acne.
Of course lack of evidence doesn’t in anyway mean that EstroBlock (or other DIM supplements) wouldn’t work. It just means we don’t know. The intellectually honest, not to mention ethical, choice would be to wait for validation in human studies before making grand claims about your products.
It seems that EstroBlock is more interested in appearing scientific than going through the scientific process of vetting and validating their claims.
Confused? Don't know how to get over acne?
Then you need to check out this short article series. In about 10 minutes you'll understand why you have acne and what you need to do to get over it. These are free articles with no email or sign-up required.
5 Awesome All-Natural Skin Care Products for Acne-Prone Skin
(hint: these are not acne products)